↓ Skip to main content

Emotional versus Cognitive Rumination: Are They Differentially Affecting Long‐term Psychological Health? The Impact of Stressors and Personality in Dental Students

Overview of attention for article published in Stress & Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Emotional versus Cognitive Rumination: Are They Differentially Affecting Long‐term Psychological Health? The Impact of Stressors and Personality in Dental Students
Published in
Stress & Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/smi.2602
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulla Hamesch, Mark Cropley, Jessica Lang

Abstract

In the process of recovery from work, rumination is considered as an important mediating variable in the relationship between work demands and psychological health outcomes. Past research differentiated affective rumination from problem-solving pondering. The aim of the present study was to test a moderated mediation model for these two distinct ruminative states and to show how personality (i.e. neuroticism and conscientiousness) can alter the mediating effect. The present study is based on 119 surveys from dental students with a time lag of 6 months. Participants filled out questionnaires assessing specific study-relevant performance demands, rumination and personality and a screening measure for psychological health status. Neuroticism was found to moderate the demand-affective rumination association, but conscientiousness did not moderate the demand-problem-solving pondering association. Moderated mediation analysis revealed that affective rumination mediates the impact of demands on psychological health only for individuals low in neuroticism. Findings are discussed regarding potential interventions for dental students to prevent negative psychological health outcomes due to increased work-related demands in the long term. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 127 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 43 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 44 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2014.
All research outputs
#28,604,603
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Stress & Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress
#690
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,007
of 273,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stress & Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.