Design and preliminary evaluation of the FINGER rehabilitation robot: controlling challenge and quantifying finger individuation during musical computer game play

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, February 2014

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 4 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 220 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Design and preliminary evaluation of the FINGER rehabilitation robot: controlling challenge and quantifying finger individuation during musical computer game play
Published in	Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, February 2014
DOI	10.1186/1743-0003-11-10
Pubmed ID	24495432
Authors	Hossein Taheri, Justin B Rowe, David Gardner, Vicki Chan, Kyle Gray, Curtis Bower, David J Reinkensmeyer, Eric T Wolbrecht
Abstract	This paper describes the design and preliminary testing of FINGER (Finger Individuating Grasp Exercise Robot), a device for assisting in finger rehabilitation after neurologic injury. We developed FINGER to assist stroke patients in moving their fingers individually in a naturalistic curling motion while playing a game similar to Guitar Hero. The goal was to make FINGER capable of assisting with motions where precise timing is important.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
United States	2	50%
Unknown	2	50%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	4	100%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Switzerland	2	<1%
United States	1	<1%
Mexico	1	<1%
Hong Kong	1	<1%
China	1	<1%
Brazil	1	<1%
Unknown	213	97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Ph. D. Student	40	18%
Student > Master	39	18%
Student > Bachelor	19	9%
Researcher	13	6%
Professor	11	5%
Other	35	16%
Unknown	63	29%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Engineering	71	32%
Medicine and Dentistry	14	6%
Nursing and Health Professions	13	6%
Neuroscience	13	6%
Psychology	8	4%
Other	31	14%
Unknown	70	32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2015.

All research outputs

#11,309,443

of 32,463,143 outputs

Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

#676

of 1,664 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#118,052

of 362,188 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

#11

of 24 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 32,463,143 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.

So far Altmetric has tracked 1,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.