↓ Skip to main content

The sustainability of ideals, values and the nursing mandate: evidence from a longitudinal qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Nursing Inquiry, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 777)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
37 X users

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The sustainability of ideals, values and the nursing mandate: evidence from a longitudinal qualitative study
Published in
Nursing Inquiry, May 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2007.00357.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This article reports on research that examines newly qualified UK nurses' experiences of implementing their ideals and values in contemporary nursing practice. Findings are presented from questionnaire and interview data from a longitudinal interpretive study of nurses' trajectories over time. On qualification nurses emerged with a coherent and strong set of espoused ideals around delivering high quality, patient-centred, holistic and evidence-based care. These were consistent with the current UK nursing mandate and had been transmitted and reinforced throughout their 'prequalification' programmes. The existence of professional and organisational constraints influenced their ability to implement these ideals and values once in practice. Data analysis revealed that within 2 years in practice the newly qualified nurses could be categorised as sustained idealists, compromised idealists, or crushed idealists. The majority experienced frustration and some level of 'burnout' as a consequence of their ideals and values being thwarted. This led to disillusionment, 'job-hopping' and, in some cases, a decision to leave the profession. These data are explored and discussed to inform the question of whether the current nursing mandate is sustainable.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 206 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Master 20 9%
Researcher 17 8%
Other 50 24%
Unknown 54 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 57 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 18%
Psychology 22 10%
Social Sciences 19 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 60 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2026.
All research outputs
#688,976
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Nursing Inquiry
#6
of 777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,127
of 124,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nursing Inquiry
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them