You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anti-allergic activity of Lactobacillus casei YIT 9029 (Shirota strain): Action mechanisms and possible application in clinical practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Lactic Acid Bacteria, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.4109/jslab.21.107 |
| Authors |
Kan SHIDA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,335,576
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Lactic Acid Bacteria
#34
of 49 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,873
of 172,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Lactic Acid Bacteria
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.