↓ Skip to main content

“Holes in my Memories”: A Qualitative Study of Men Affected by Father Absence

Overview of attention for article published in Issues in Mental Health Nursing, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
“Holes in my Memories”: A Qualitative Study of Men Affected by Father Absence
Published in
Issues in Mental Health Nursing, July 2014
DOI 10.3109/01612840.2013.867466
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This qualitative study explored adult men's experiences of father absence. Interviews with 21 men between the ages of 24 and 70 explored narratives of father absence and how the men perceived this influenced their life trajectory. Thematic analysis revealed that these men experienced a range of difficulties and challenges, including episodes of sadness and depression associated with loss and grief for the paternal relationship, self-esteem issues, feelings of anger and rejection, and difficulty forming trusting relationships particularly with other men. This study contributes to understanding mental health issues that can be associated with paternal absence for men.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 28 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 18%
Social Sciences 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 32 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,723,999
of 32,091,044 outputs
Outputs from Issues in Mental Health Nursing
#229
of 1,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,007
of 258,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Issues in Mental Health Nursing
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,091,044 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.