| Title |
Nonlinear Pedagogy: An Effective Approach to Cater for Individual Differences in Learning a Sports Skill
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0104744 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Learning a sports skill is a complex process in which practitioners are challenged to cater for individual differences. The main purpose of this study was to explore the effectiveness of a Nonlinear Pedagogy approach for learning a sports skill. Twenty-four 10-year-old females participated in a 4-week intervention involving either a Nonlinear Pedagogy (i.e.,manipulation of task constraints including equipment and rules) or a Linear Pedagogy (i.e., prescriptive, repetitive drills) approach to learn a tennis forehand stroke. Performance accuracy scores, movement criterion scores and kinematic data were measured during pre-intervention, post-intervention and retention tests. While both groups showed improvements in performance accuracy scores over time, the Nonlinear Pedagogy group displayed a greater number of movement clusters at post-test indicating the presence of degeneracy (i.e., many ways to achieve the same outcome). The results suggest that degeneracy is effective for learning a sports skill facilitated by a Nonlinear Pedagogy approach. These findings challenge the common misconception that there must be only one ideal movement solution for a task and thus have implications for coaches and educators when designing instructions for skill acquisition. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 19% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| Ireland | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Finland | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 77% |
| Scientists | 6 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 380 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 19% |
| Unknown | 116 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 148 | 38% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 4% |
| Psychology | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 12% |
| Unknown | 120 | 31% |