↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Unmet Expectations in Alzheimer’s Family Caregiving: Interactional Characteristics Associated With Perceived Under-Contribution
Published in
Gerontologist, September 2017
DOI 10.1093/geront/gnx141
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Perceptions about family members not contributing enough to caregiving are documented to create psychological stress among caregivers. This study investigated whether individuals' perception that family members are under-contributing in caregiving processes was associated with their psychological well-being and explored the factors that may contribute to such perception borrowing concepts from a previous study: malfeasance, nonfeasance, and uplift. Seventy-two members of 30 families recruited through residential and adult daycare settings provided information about 960 familial network members (e.g., family, friends). Perceived levels of participation in caregiving about each network member, whether the level met respondents' expectations, and interactions representing malfeasance, nonfeasance, and uplift were assessed. Number of family members respondents identified as under-contributing in caregiving was associated with higher, whereas numbers of family participating in caregiving and supportive staff were associated with lower distress (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale [CES-D]). Factor analyses identified a set of social interactions among familial network members capturing three constructs: malfeasance, nonfeasance, and uplift. Network members for whom respondents reported higher levels of nonfeasance were more likely to be identified as under-contributing in direct care (odds ratio [OR] = 1.92), care decision making (OR = 1.89), and social support (OR = 1.74) compared with those identified as contributing enough. Members with higher levels of malfeasance were more likely to be identified as under-contributing in direct care (OR = 1.19) than those identified as contributing enough. Social interactions characterized as nonfeasance may explain the perception of unmet expectations in caregiving within families and may represent a potential focus of family-level interventions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 42 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 19%
Social Sciences 14 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Psychology 11 10%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 41 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#11,825,413
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Gerontologist
#1,791
of 3,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,806
of 356,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gerontologist
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.