| Title |
Weapon performance, not size, determines mating success and potential reproductive output in the collared lizard (Crotaphytus collaris).
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The American Naturalist, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1086/432564 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
In territorial polygynous taxa, reproductive success reflects phenotypic variation. Using Crotaphytus collaris, a sexually dimorphic lizard in which males use the head (i.e., jaws and associated musculature) as a weapon when territorial interactions escalate to fights, we tested the hypothesis that weapon performance (i.e., bite force) is a better predictor of fitness than body or weapon size. Bite-force performance predicted the number of female home ranges overlapped, estimated mating success, and potential reproductive output. However, no body or weapon size measure correlated with these estimates of fitness, and only one weapon dimension (head width) correlated with bite force. These results indicate that weapon performance has far stronger effects on fitness than body or weapon size, likely because it directly influences fight outcomes. As such, it is desirable that the use of morphology as a proxy for performance and its presumed extensions to fitness be based on empirical morphology-performance relationships. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 174 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 24% |
| Researcher | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 21% |
| Unknown | 17 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 137 | 71% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |