↓ Skip to main content

How Does It Feel to Be Like a Rolling Stone? Ten Questions About Dispersal Evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
1303 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How Does It Feel to Be Like a Rolling Stone? Ten Questions About Dispersal Evolution
Published in
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, December 2007
DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095611
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 22 2%
Brazil 15 1%
France 9 <1%
South Africa 6 <1%
Germany 6 <1%
Mexico 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Israel 4 <1%
Argentina 3 <1%
Other 34 3%
Unknown 1195 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 306 23%
Researcher 263 20%
Student > Master 208 16%
Student > Bachelor 113 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 61 5%
Other 199 15%
Unknown 153 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 789 61%
Environmental Science 208 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 1%
Mathematics 10 <1%
Other 59 5%
Unknown 176 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2026.
All research outputs
#10,318,204
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#388
of 529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,788
of 226,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.