↓ Skip to main content

An Illustration of Using Multiple Imputation Versus Listwise Deletion Analyses: The Effect of Hanen's “More Than Words” on Parenting Stress

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An Illustration of Using Multiple Imputation Versus Listwise Deletion Analyses: The Effect of Hanen's “More Than Words” on Parenting Stress
Published in
American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, September 2014
DOI 10.1352/1944-7558-119.5.472
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This investigation illustrates the effects of using different missing data analysis techniques to analyze effects of a parent-implemented treatment on stress in parents of toddlers with autism symptomatology. The analysis approaches yielded similar results when analyzing main effects of the intervention, but different findings for moderation effects. Using listwise deletion, the data supported an iatrogenic effect of Hanen's "More Than Words" on stress in parents with high levels of pretreatment depressive symptoms. Using multiple imputation, a significant moderated treatment effect with uninterpretable regions of significance did not support an iatrogenic effect of treatment on parenting stress. Results highlight the need for caution in interpreting analyses that do not involve validated methods of handling missing data.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 108 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 36 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 30%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 41 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2014.
All research outputs
#28,603,920
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
#262
of 339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,906
of 280,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.