↓ Skip to main content

X-ray phase contrast imaging of the bone–cartilage interface

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Radiation & Isotopes, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
X-ray phase contrast imaging of the bone–cartilage interface
Published in
Applied Radiation & Isotopes, September 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.09.042
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Synovial joints articulate in a lubricating environment, the system providing for smooth articulation. The articular cartilage overlying the bone consists of a network of collagen fibres. This network is essential to cartilage integrity, suffering damage in degenerative joint disease such as osteoarthritis. At Surrey and also in work conducted by this group at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) synchrotron site we have been applying a number of techniques to study the bone-cartilage interface and of changes occurring in this with disease. One of the techniques attracting particular interest is X-ray phase contrast imaging, yielding information on anatomical features that manifest from the large scale organisation of collagen and the mineralised phase contained within the collagen fibres in the deep cartilage zone. This work briefly reviews some of the basic supporting physics of X-ray phase contrast imaging and then shows example images of the articular surface and subchondral bone and other supporting results obtained to-date. Present results have been obtained on sections of bone not displaying evidence of an osteoarthritic lesion and can be used as a baseline against which diseased bone can be compared.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Norway 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 45 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 28%
Student > Master 8 15%
Other 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 24 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Engineering 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Computer Science 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2014.
All research outputs
#28,600,579
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Applied Radiation & Isotopes
#1,847
of 2,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,495
of 149,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Radiation & Isotopes
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.