↓ Skip to main content

Selective attention and pigeons’ multiple necessary cues discrimination learning

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioural Processes, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Selective attention and pigeons’ multiple necessary cues discrimination learning
Published in
Behavioural Processes, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We deployed the Multiple Necessary Cues (MNC) discrimination task to see if pigeons can simultaneously attend to four different dimensions of complex visual stimuli. Specifically, we trained eight pigeons on a simultaneous discrimination to peck only 1 of 16 compound stimuli created from all possible combinations of two stimulus values from four separable visual dimensions: shape (circle/square), size (large/small), line orientation (horizontal/vertical), and brightness (dark/light). Some pigeons had CLHD (circle, large, horizontal, dark) as the positive stimulus (S+), whereas others had SSVL (square, small, vertical, light) as the S+. All eight pigeons acquired the MNC discrimination, suggesting that they had attended to all four dimensions. Learning rate was similar to all four dimensions, with learning along the orientation dimension being a bit faster than along the other three dimensions. The more dimensions along which the S-s differed from the S+, the faster was learning, suggesting an added benefit from increasing perceptual disparities between the S-s and the S+. Of particular note, evidence of attentional tradeoffs among the four dimensions was much weaker with the simultaneous task than with the successive task. We consider several reasons for this empirical disparity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Design 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2014.
All research outputs
#24,527,408
of 27,263,163 outputs
Outputs from Behavioural Processes
#1,666
of 1,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,493
of 249,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioural Processes
#45
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,263,163 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.