↓ Skip to main content

Hypotheses regarding the discontinuous gas exchange cycle (DGC) of insects

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Insect Science, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hypotheses regarding the discontinuous gas exchange cycle (DGC) of insects
Published in
Current Opinion in Insect Science, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.cois.2014.08.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The evolutionary origin of the insect respiratory pattern referred to as the discontinuous gas exchange cycle (DGC) has been a topic of extensive discussion among insect physiologists for at least 50 years. This pattern has often been thought to reduce respiratory water loss (RWL). However, because this pattern does not consistently conserve water among all taxa, other hypotheses have been proposed to try and explain the significance of the DGC. In this review we briefly describe the different hypotheses postulated to date. We conclude that the DGC is primarily a respiratory pattern deriving from the simultaneous regulation of O2 and CO2. It may nonetheless have additional adaptive functions in insects.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Other 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 27%