↓ Skip to main content

2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Rhythm, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
54 X users
patent
2 patents
guideline
7 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
582 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction
Published in
Heart Rhythm, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 582 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 582 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 83 14%
Other 76 13%
Student > Postgraduate 36 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 4%
Other 89 15%
Unknown 242 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 219 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 3%
Engineering 14 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 1%
Other 44 8%
Unknown 277 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2025.
All research outputs
#683,302
of 33,695,692 outputs
Outputs from Heart Rhythm
#119
of 6,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,723
of 350,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Rhythm
#7
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,695,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.