↓ Skip to main content

The Forgotten Need of Disaster Relief

Overview of attention for article published in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (Highwire), September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Forgotten Need of Disaster Relief
Published in
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (Highwire), September 2017
DOI 10.1017/dmp.2017.67
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Disasters in countries with limited resources can put the emergency preparedness of the country to the test. The first major task after a disaster is to take care of the wounded. In countries where the epidemiological transition has occurred, chronic disease can place a major strain on public health preparedness after a disaster. The purpose of this field report is to alert public health practitioners of an infrequently reported public health problem: the impact of natural disasters on adherence to chronic medications. In our experience, the most common complaint in the weeks that followed the 2016 earthquake was not having access to their chronic medications. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;page 1 of 3).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 11 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2017.
All research outputs
#21,513,926
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (Highwire)
#877
of 1,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,651
of 356,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (Highwire)
#10
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.