↓ Skip to main content

LoRDEC: accurate and efficient long read error correction

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
438 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
LoRDEC: accurate and efficient long read error correction
Published in
Bioinformatics, August 2014
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu538
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
France 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 414 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 18%
Student > Master 62 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 7%
Professor 19 4%
Other 76 17%
Unknown 88 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 156 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 84 19%
Computer Science 54 12%
Engineering 5 1%
Neuroscience 5 1%
Other 34 8%
Unknown 100 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,072,476
of 28,316,873 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#1,833
of 10,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,822
of 250,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#47
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,316,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.