↓ Skip to main content

CAY10591, a SIRT1 activator, suppresses cell growth, invasion, and migration in gingival epithelial carcinoma cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Oral Science, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CAY10591, a SIRT1 activator, suppresses cell growth, invasion, and migration in gingival epithelial carcinoma cells
Published in
Journal of Oral Science, January 2017
DOI 10.2334/josnusd.16-0696
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takahisa Murofushi, Hiromasa Tsuda, Yoshikazu Mikami, Yoko Yamaguchi, Naoto Suzuki

Abstract

SIRT1 is a NAD-dependent histone deacetylase that is important in a wide variety of physiological and pathophysiological processes. Although many studies have examined the relationship between SIRT1 and cancer, the role of SIRT1 in tumor malignancy is controversial. Here, we examined the effects of the SIRT1 activator CAY10591 in gingival epithelial carcinoma Ca9-22 cells. CAY10591 treatment dose- and time-dependently increased SIRT1 level and activity. The treatment decreased cell growth and induced cell-cycle repressor p21 levels. In addition, dimethyl sulfoxide significantly reduced cellular invasion and migration, and CAY10591 enhanced this decrease. Quantitative PCR analysis showed that CAY10591 decreased expression of several invasion/migration promoter genes and induced repressor genes. Our findings suggest that CAY10591 suppresses cell growth and invasion/migration activity in gingival squamous cell carcinoma Ca9-22 cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Librarian 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Unspecified 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,572,036
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oral Science
#163
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,407
of 421,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oral Science
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.