↓ Skip to main content

Relative influences of climate change and human activity on the onshore distribution of polar bears

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relative influences of climate change and human activity on the onshore distribution of polar bears
Published in
Biological Conservation, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.08.005
Authors

Ryan R. Wilson, Eric V. Regehr, Michelle St. Martin, Todd C. Atwood, Elizabeth Peacock, Susanne Miller, George Divoky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 21%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Master 14 12%
Other 8 7%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 31%
Environmental Science 34 28%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 33 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,226
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,234
of 334,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#72
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.