↓ Skip to main content

Shake It Off

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of burn care & research, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Shake It Off
Published in
Journal of burn care & research, January 2017
DOI 10.1097/bcr.0000000000000481
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Whole body vibration (WBV) has been shown to improve strength in extremities with healed burn wounds. We hypothesize that WBV reduces pain during rehabilitation compared to standard therapy alone. Patients with ≥1% TBSA burn to one or more extremities from October 2014 to December 2015 were randomized to vibration (VIBE) or control. Each burned extremity was tested separately within the assigned group. Patients underwent one to three therapy sessions (S1, S2, S3) consisting of five upper and/or lower extremity exercises with or without WBV. Pain was assessed pre-, mid-, and postsession on a scale of 1 to 10. Mean pain scores at S1 to S3 were compared between groups with paired samples t-tests. An independent t-test was used to compare differences in pain scores between groups. Continuous variables were compared using a t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were compared using a χ or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Forty-eight randomized test extremities (VIBE = 26, control = 22) were analyzed from a total of 31 subjects. There were no significant differences between groups in age, gender, overall TBSA, TBSA in the test extremity, pain medication use before therapy session, or skin grafting before therapy session. At S1, S2, and S3, there was a statistically significant decrease in mid- and postsession pain compared to presession pain in VIBE vs controls. Exposure to WBV decreased pain during and after physical therapy. This modality may be applicable to a variety of soft tissue injuries and warrants additional investigation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 32 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 32 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#22,269,201
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of burn care & research
#922
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,691
of 462,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of burn care & research
#69
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.