↓ Skip to main content

Self-Organization of Ions at the Interface between Graphene and Ionic Liquid DEME-TFSI

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Self-Organization of Ions at the Interface between Graphene and Ionic Liquid DEME-TFSI
Published in
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, September 2017
DOI 10.1021/acsami.7b10912
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Electrochemical effects manifest as nonlinear responses to an applied electric field in electrochemical devices, and are linked intimately to the molecular orientation of ions in the electric double layer (EDL). Herein, we probe the origin of the electrochemical effect using a double-gate graphene field effect transistor (GFET) of ionic liquid N,N-diethyl-N-(2-methoxyethyl)-N-methylammonium bis-(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)-imide (DEME-TFSI) top-gate, paired with a ferroelectric Pb0.92La0.08Zr0.52Ti0.48O3 (PLZT) back-gate of compatible gating efficiency. The orientation of the interfacial molecular ions can be extracted by measuing the GFET Dirac point shift, and their dynamic response to ultraviolet-visible light and gate electric field was quantified. We have observed that the strong electrochemical effect is due to the TFSI anions self-organizing on a treated GFET surface. Moreover, a reversible order-disorder transition of TFSI anions self-organized on GFET surface can be triggered by illuminating the interface with ultraviolet-visible light, revealing it is a useful method to control the surface ion configuration and the overall performance of the device.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 17 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 18%
Physics and Astronomy 7 16%
Materials Science 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 19 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2017.
All research outputs
#17,893,049
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#11,190
of 17,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,211
of 320,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#284
of 418 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 418 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.