↓ Skip to main content

A survey study of women’s responses to information about overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening in Britain

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A survey study of women’s responses to information about overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening in Britain
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, August 2014
DOI 10.1038/bjc.2014.482
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Background:There is concern about public understanding of overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening, and uncertainty about the likely impact on screening participation.Methods:In a population-based survey of 2272 women, we assessed understanding of overdiagnosis and screening intentions before and after exposure to an explanation of overdiagnosis, and one of the three information formats providing an estimate of the rate of overdiagnosis based on the findings of the UK Independent Review.Results:Subjective and objective comprehension of overdiagnosis was moderate across information formats (64% and 57%, respectively). Following overdiagnosis information, 7% of women showed a decrease in screening intention, with a stronger effect among women below screening age (<47 years), and receiving the estimate of the rate of overdiagnosis in a simple ratio format (one life saved to three overdiagnoses).Conclusions:Brief written information on overdiagnosis was incompletely understood, but reduced breast screening intentions in a proportion of women, regardless of comprehension. Subjective comprehension was lower among women who had not yet reached screening age but the deterrent effect was higher.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication, 28 August 2014; doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.482 www.bjcancer.com.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Ethiopia 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Other 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 33%
Psychology 11 11%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 28 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2018.
All research outputs
#579,657
of 33,250,112 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#169
of 12,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,534
of 270,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#2
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,250,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.