| Title |
Non-visible versus visible haematuria and bladder cancer risk: a study of electronic records in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp14x681409 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah J Price, Elizabeth A Shephard, Sally A Stapley, Kevin Barraclough, William T Hamilton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 47% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 21% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,224,821
of 25,388,177 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#565
of 4,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,396
of 248,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#3
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.