You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oseltamivir, amantadine, and ribavirin combination antiviral therapy versus oseltamivir monotherapy for the treatment of influenza: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 2 trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30476-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John H Beigel, Yajing Bao, Joy Beeler, Weerawat Manosuthi, Alex Slandzicki, Sadia M Dar, John Panuto, Richard L Beasley, Santiago Perez-Patrigeon, Gompol Suwanpimolkul, Marcelo H Losso, Natalie McClure, Dawn R Bozzolo, Christopher Myers, H Preston Holley, Justin Hoopes, H Clifford Lane, Michael D Hughes, Richard T Davey, IRC003 Study Team, Michael Winnie, Dinh V Dinh, Raghu Seethala, Hiram Garcia, Joe Pouzar, Michael Seep, Ernie Riffer, Belinda Bart, Sadia Dar, Melanie Hoppers, John Panuto, Heather Rowe, Alex Slandzicki, Cameron Wolfe, Donna Desantis, Barr Baynton, Richard L Beasley, Norman Markowitz, Zebediah A Stearns, Josalyn Cho, Marcy Goisse, Thomas A Wolf, Jennifer Kay, Nila Dharan, William Fitzgibbons, Mark Woodruff, Todd Bell, Thomas Lenzmeier, Robert Schooley, Marie-Carmelle Elie, Patricia Winokur, Robert Finberg, Christopher Hurt, Pablo Tebas, Fred R Sattler, Madhavi Ampajwala, Donald Batts, Mark Bloch, Richard Moore, Dominic Dwyer, Javier Romo-Garcia, Santiago Perez Patrigeon, Ana Patricia Rodríguez Zulueta, Weerawat Manosuthi, Ploenchan Chetchotisakd, Kiat Ruxrungtham, Anchalee Avihingsanon, Gompol Suwanpimolkul, Winai Ratanasuwan, Sergio Lupo, Liliana Trape, Marcelo H Losso, Laura M Macias, Gustavo Lopardo, Laura Barcelona, Analia Mykietuk, Maria F Alzogaray |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 13% |
| Spain | 6 | 9% |
| Japan | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 61% |
| Scientists | 12 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 190 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 66 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 78 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#543,886
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#883
of 7,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,507
of 357,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#16
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.