↓ Skip to main content

The impact of expanding Medicaid on health insurance coverage and labor market outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Economics and Management, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The impact of expanding Medicaid on health insurance coverage and labor market outcomes
Published in
International Journal of Health Economics and Management, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10754-017-9226-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Expansions of public health insurance have the potential to reduce the uninsured rate, but also to reduce coverage through employer-sponsored insurance (ESI), reduce labor supply, and increase job mobility. In January 2014, twenty-five states expanded Medicaid as part of the Affordable Care Act to low-income parents and childless adults. Using data from the 2011-2015 March Current Population Survey Supplements, we compare the changes in insurance coverage and labor market outcomes over time of adults in states that expanded Medicaid and in states that did not. Our estimates suggest that the recent expansion significantly increased Medicaid coverage with little decrease in ESI. Overall, the expansion did not impact labor market outcomes, including labor force participation, employment, and hours worked.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 27%
Social Sciences 8 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2017.
All research outputs
#26,623,015
of 32,145,349 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Economics and Management
#258
of 320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,770
of 344,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Economics and Management
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,145,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.