Offline eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Global Health, June 2014

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy: 2 policy sources

twitter: 2 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 199 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Offline eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction
Published in	Journal of Global Health, June 2014
DOI	10.7189/jogh.04.010405
Pubmed ID	24976964
Authors	Kristine Rasmussen, José Marcano Belisario, Petra A Wark, Joseph Antonio Molina, Stewart Lee Loong, Ziva Cotic, Nikos Papachristou, Eva Riboli-Sasco, Lorainne Tudor Car, Eve Marie Musulanov, Holger Kunz, Yanfeng Zhang, Pradeep Paul George, Bee Hoon Heng, Erica Lynette Wheeler, Najeeb Al Shorbaji, Igor Svab, Rifat Atun, Azeem Majeed, Josip Car
Abstract	The world is short of 7.2 million health-care workers and this figure is growing. The shortage of teachers is even greater, which limits traditional education modes. eLearning may help overcome this training need. Offline eLearning is useful in remote and resource-limited settings with poor internet access. To inform investments in offline eLearning, we need to establish its effectiveness in terms of gaining knowledge and skills, students' satisfaction and attitudes towards eLearning.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Spain	1	50%
United States	1	50%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	1	50%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	1	50%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Vietnam	1	<1%
United Kingdom	1	<1%
Spain	1	<1%
Unknown	196	98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	22	11%
Researcher	21	11%
Student > Bachelor	16	8%
Professor > Associate Professor	11	6%
Other	10	5%
Other	51	26%
Unknown	68	34%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	51	26%
Nursing and Health Professions	25	13%
Social Sciences	19	10%
Computer Science	11	6%
Arts and Humanities	5	3%
Other	18	9%
Unknown	70	35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2016.

All research outputs

#6,473,338

of 34,054,827 outputs

Outputs from Journal of Global Health

#352

of 1,322 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#52,535

of 272,749 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Journal of Global Health

of 8 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 34,054,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 1,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.