↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
43 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
79 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Regular Breakfast Consumption and Type 2 Diabetes Risk Markers in 9- to 10-Year-Old Children in the Child Heart and Health Study in England (CHASE): A Cross-Sectional Analysis
Published in
PLOS Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001703
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Regular breakfast consumption may protect against type 2 diabetes risk in adults but little is known about its influence on type 2 diabetes risk markers in children. We investigated the associations between breakfast consumption (frequency and content) and risk markers for type 2 diabetes (particularly insulin resistance and glycaemia) and cardiovascular disease in children.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 251 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 16%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Researcher 20 8%
Other 13 5%
Other 55 21%
Unknown 70 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 7%
Sports and Recreations 12 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 79 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 345. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2026.
All research outputs
#119,985
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#271
of 5,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#812
of 280,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#1
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 82.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.