You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Best Practices for Mapping Replication Origins in Eukaryotic Chromosomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current protocols in cell biology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/0471143030.cb2218s64 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Understanding the regulatory principles ensuring complete DNA replication in each cell division is critical for deciphering the mechanisms that maintain genomic stability. Recent advances in genome sequencing technology facilitated complete mapping of DNA replication sites and helped move the field from observing replication patterns at a handful of single loci to analyzing replication patterns genome-wide. These advances address issues, such as the relationship between replication initiation events, transcription, and chromatin modifications, and identify potential replication origin consensus sequences. This unit summarizes the technological and fundamental aspects of replication profiling and briefly discusses novel insights emerging from mining large datasets, published in the last 3 years, and also describes DNA replication dynamics on a whole-genome scale. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 64:22.18.1-22.18.13. © 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 37% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 37% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#31,623,659
of 34,826,706 outputs
Outputs from Current protocols in cell biology
#225
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,422
of 281,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current protocols in cell biology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,826,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.