↓ Skip to main content

Blood tests in tired elite athletes: expectations of athletes, coaches and sport science/sports medicine staff

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Blood tests in tired elite athletes: expectations of athletes, coaches and sport science/sports medicine staff
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, October 2006
DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2006.030999
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The issue of the expectations of elite athletes, their coaches and non-medically qualified athlete support staff of consultations with sports physicians has not been previously dealt with in the sports medicine literature. As fulfillment of expectations of the content of a consultation may influence patient's satisfaction and clinical outcome, it is important to assess the expectations of athletes and, most importantly, coaches.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 115 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 14%
Researcher 16 13%
Other 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 43 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 32 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,314,634
of 29,660,600 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#2,042
of 6,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,343
of 97,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#5
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,660,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.