↓ Skip to main content

The Relationships among Changes of Eruption Order of the First Permanent Teeth, Way of Feeding at Infancy, and Taste at the Present Time on Children in a Kindergarten

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Health and Human Ecology, January 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Relationships among Changes of Eruption Order of the First Permanent Teeth, Way of Feeding at Infancy, and Taste at the Present Time on Children in a Kindergarten
Published in
Japanese Journal of Health and Human Ecology, January 1989
DOI 10.3861/jshhe.55.159
Authors

Hiroko NAKAO, Masako SHIMURA, Hideyasu AOYAMA, Teiji MIURA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Health and Human Ecology
#44
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,157
of 53,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Health and Human Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them