↓ Skip to main content

Overcoming barriers to electronic medical record (EMR) implementation in the US healthcare system: A comparative study

Overview of attention for article published in Health Informatics Journal, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Overcoming barriers to electronic medical record (EMR) implementation in the US healthcare system: A comparative study
Published in
Health Informatics Journal, January 2011
DOI 10.1177/1460458210380523
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sameer Kumar, Krista Aldrich

Abstract

An EMR system implementation would significantly reduce clinician workload and medical errors while saving the US healthcare system major expense. Yet, compared to other developed nations, the US lags behind. This article examines EMR system efforts, benefits, and barriers, as well as steps needed to move the US closer to a nationwide EMR system. The analysis includes a blueprint for implementation of EMR, industry comparisons to highlight the differences between successful and non-successful EMR ventures, references to costs and benefit information, and identification of root causes. 'Poka-yokes' (avoid (yokeru) mistakes (poka)) will be inserted to provide insight into how to systematically overcome challenges. Implementation will require upfront costs including patient privacy that must be addressed early in the development process. Government structure, incentives and mandates are required for nationwide EMR system in the US.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 268 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Postgraduate 20 7%
Researcher 16 6%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 78 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 21%
Computer Science 50 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 6%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 84 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,407,124
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Health Informatics Journal
#154
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,377
of 180,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Informatics Journal
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.