↓ Skip to main content

Diurnal postprandial responses to low and high glycaemic index mixed meals

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Nutrition, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Diurnal postprandial responses to low and high glycaemic index mixed meals
Published in
Clinical Nutrition, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.09.018
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Glycaemic index testing is conducted in the morning, however postprandial glycaemia has a diurnal rhythm. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of glycaemic index on glucose tolerance at different times during the day.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 31 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,380,476
of 32,192,432 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nutrition
#498
of 4,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,868
of 246,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nutrition
#5
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,192,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.