↓ Skip to main content

Copy-number variants and candidate gene mutations in isolated split hand/foot malformation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Human Genetics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Copy-number variants and candidate gene mutations in isolated split hand/foot malformation
Published in
Journal of Human Genetics, May 2017
DOI 10.1038/jhg.2017.56
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Split hand/foot malformation (SHFM) is a congenital limb deficiency with missing or shortened central digits. Some SHFM genes have been identified but the cause of many SHFM cases is unknown. We used single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray analysis to detect copy-number variants (CNVs) in 25 SHFM cases without other birth defects from New York State (NYS), prioritized CNVs absent from population CNV databases, and validated these CNVs using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). We tested for the validated CNVs in seven cases from Iowa using qPCR, and also sequenced 36 SHFM candidate genes in all the subjects. Seven NYS cases had a potentially deleterious variant: two had a p.R225H or p.R225L mutation in TP63, one had a 17q25 microdeletion, one had a 10q24 microduplication and three had a 17p13.3 microduplication. In addition, one Iowa case had a de novo 10q24 microduplication. The 17q25 microdeletion has not been reported previously in SHFM and included two SHFM candidate genes (SUMO2 and GRB2), while the 10q24 and 17p13.3 CNVs had breakpoints within genomic regions that contained putative regulatory elements and a limb development gene. In SHFM pathogenesis, the microdeletion may cause haploinsufficiency of SHFM genes and/or deletion of their regulatory regions, and the microduplications could disrupt regulatory elements that control transcription of limb development genes.Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 25 May 2017; doi:10.1038/jhg.2017.56.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Master 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Mathematics 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#11,552,073
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Genetics
#828
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,838
of 358,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Genetics
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.