↓ Skip to main content

Topology and dynamics of active nematic vesicles

Overview of attention for article published in Science, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
24 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
4 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
618 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Topology and dynamics of active nematic vesicles
Published in
Science, September 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1254784
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Engineering synthetic materials that mimic the remarkable complexity of living organisms is a fundamental challenge in science and technology. We studied the spatiotemporal patterns that emerge when an active nematic film of microtubules and molecular motors is encapsulated within a shape-changing lipid vesicle. Unlike in equilibrium systems, where defects are largely static structures, in active nematics defects move spontaneously and can be described as self-propelled particles. The combination of activity, topological constraints, and vesicle deformability produces a myriad of dynamical states. We highlight two dynamical modes: a tunable periodic state that oscillates between two defect configurations, and shape-changing vesicles with streaming filopodia-like protrusions. These results demonstrate how biomimetic materials can be obtained when topological constraints are used to control the non-equilibrium dynamics of active matter.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 618 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
Japan 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 598 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 178 29%
Researcher 98 16%
Student > Master 51 8%
Professor 35 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 5%
Other 90 15%
Unknown 136 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 222 36%
Engineering 56 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 8%
Chemistry 41 7%
Materials Science 24 4%
Other 70 11%
Unknown 153 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 203. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2025.
All research outputs
#239,684
of 33,222,652 outputs
Outputs from Science
#6,377
of 93,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,731
of 272,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#62
of 885 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,222,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 885 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.