↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive Risk Factors for Specific Learning Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Learning Disabilities, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cognitive Risk Factors for Specific Learning Disorder
Published in
Journal of Learning Disabilities, August 2014
DOI 10.1177/0022219414547221
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

High comorbidity rates between reading disorder (RD) and mathematics disorder (MD) indicate that, although the cognitive core deficits underlying these disorders are distinct, additional domain-general risk factors might be shared between the disorders. Three domain-general cognitive abilities were investigated in children with RD and MD: processing speed, temporal processing, and working memory. Since attention problems frequently co-occur with learning disorders, the study examined whether these three factors, which are known to be associated with attention problems, account for the comorbidity between these disorders. The sample comprised 99 primary school children in four groups: children with RD, children with MD, children with both disorders (RD+MD), and typically developing children (TD controls). Measures of processing speed, temporal processing, and memory were analyzed in a series of ANCOVAs including attention ratings as covariate. All three risk factors were associated with poor attention. After controlling for attention, associations with RD and MD differed: Although deficits in verbal memory were associated with both RD and MD, reduced processing speed was related to RD, but not MD; and the association with RD was restricted to processing speed for familiar nameable symbols. In contrast, impairments in temporal processing and visuospatial memory were associated with MD, but not RD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 347 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 13%
Student > Bachelor 42 12%
Researcher 30 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 8%
Other 62 18%
Unknown 96 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 137 39%
Social Sciences 26 7%
Neuroscience 21 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 107 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#11,422,957
of 34,281,662 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Learning Disabilities
#394
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,296
of 275,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Learning Disabilities
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,281,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.