↓ Skip to main content

Association Between Arterial Catheter Use and Hospital Mortality in Intensive Care Units

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Internal Medicine, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
70 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
f1000
1 research highlight platform
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Association Between Arterial Catheter Use and Hospital Mortality in Intensive Care Units
Published in
JAMA Internal Medicine, November 2014
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3297
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Arterial catheters are used frequently in intensive care units (ICUs). Clinical effectiveness and adverse events associated with the use of the catheters have not been formally evaluated in clinical studies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 91 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Other 8 8%
Professor 7 7%
Other 27 28%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 55%
Engineering 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 20 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2025.
All research outputs
#963,813
of 34,652,893 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#2,483
of 6,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,668
of 306,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#43
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,652,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 156.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.