↓ Skip to main content

Physical and mental health outcomes following housing improvements: evidence from the GoWell study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978), September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
13 X users

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Physical and mental health outcomes following housing improvements: evidence from the GoWell study
Published in
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978), September 2014
DOI 10.1136/jech-2014-204064
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Existing research points towards physical and mental health gains from housing improvements, but findings are inconsistent and often not statistically significant. The detailed characteristics and variability of housing improvement works are problematic and studies are often small, not experimental, with short follow-up times.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 3%
New Zealand 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 191 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 10 5%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 64 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 42 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Psychology 9 5%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 76 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,379,360
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978)
#937
of 5,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,721
of 281,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978)
#12
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.