↓ Skip to main content

雑草防除用生物資材としてのオカダンゴムシArmadillidium vulgare の有効性

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Environmental Entomology and Zoology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
雑草防除用生物資材としてのオカダンゴムシArmadillidium vulgare の有効性
Published in
Japanese Journal of Environmental Entomology and Zoology, September 2017
DOI 10.11257/jjeez.27.81
Authors

高倉 耕一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2017.
All research outputs
#17,443,636
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Environmental Entomology and Zoology
#49
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,607
of 325,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Environmental Entomology and Zoology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.