↓ Skip to main content

Exploring selective neural electrical stimulation for upper limb functions restoration

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Translational Myology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 288)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Exploring selective neural electrical stimulation for upper limb functions restoration
Published in
European Journal of Translational Myology, June 2016
DOI 10.4081/ejtm.2016.6035
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This article introduces a new approach of selective neural electrical stimulation of the upper limb nerves. Median and radial nerves of individuals with tetraplegia are stimulated via a multipolar cuff electrode to elicit movements of wrist and hand in acute conditions during a surgical intervention. Various configurations corresponding to various combinations of a 12-poles cuff electrode contacts are tested. Video recording and electromyographic (EMG) signals recorded via sterile surface electrodes are used to evaluate the selectivity of each stimulation configuration in terms of activated muscles. In this abstract we introduce the protocol and preliminary results will be presented during the conference.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 33%
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Engineering 5 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,404,891
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Translational Myology
#34
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,998
of 323,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Translational Myology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them