↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Implications of inadequate lymph node staging in resectable gastric cancer: A contemporary analysis using the National Cancer Data Base
Published in
Cancer (0008543X), May 2014
DOI 10.1002/cncr.28780
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

National guidelines recommend examination of ≥ 15 lymph nodes for adequate staging of resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). The relevance of these guidelines, which were established before the increasing use of multimodality therapy, and the impact of inadequate lymph node staging (LNS) in a contemporary cohort have not been extensively explored.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Ecuador 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Other 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 12 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Unknown 14 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#27,765,099
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#17,749
of 18,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,679
of 273,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#135
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.