Fluoride ion (F(-)) is a ubiquitous environmental threat to microorganisms, which have evolved a family of highly selective "Fluc" F(-) channels that export this inhibitory anion from their cytoplasm. It is unclear, however, how a thermodynamically passive mechanism like an ion channel can protect against high concentrations of external F(-). We monitored external F(-) concentrations in Escherichia coli suspensions and showed that, in bacteria lacking Fluc, F(-) accumulates when the external medium is acidified, as a predicted function of the transmembrane pH gradient. This weak acid accumulation effect, which results from the high pKa (3.4) and membrane permeability of HF, is abolished by Fluc channels. We also found that, although bacterial growth is inhibited by high concentrations of F(-), bacteria can withstand cytoplasmic F(-) at levels a hundred times higher than those that inhibit proliferation, resuming growth when the F(-) challenge is removed.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2017.
All research outputs
#481,673
of 28,840,878 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Physiology
#12
of 2,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,880
of 252,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Physiology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,840,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
