↓ Skip to main content

The Drosophila ecdysone receptor (EcR) Gene Is Required Maternally for Normal Oogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Drosophila ecdysone receptor (EcR) Gene Is Required Maternally for Normal Oogenesis
Published in
Genetics, March 2000
DOI 10.1093/genetics/154.3.1203
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Oogenesis in Drosophila is regulated by the steroid hormone ecdysone and the sesquiterpenoid juvenile hormone. Response to ecdysone is mediated by a heteromeric receptor composed of the EcR and USP proteins. We have identified a temperature-sensitive EcR mutation, EcR(A483T), from a previously isolated collection of EcR mutations. EcR(A483T) is predicted to affect all EcR protein products (EcR-A, EcR-B1, and EcR-B2) since it maps to a common exon encoding the ligand-binding domain. In wild-type females, we find that both EcR-A and EcR-B1 are expressed in nurse cells and follicle cells throughout oogenesis. EcR mutant females raised at permissive temperature and then shifted to restrictive temperature exhibit severe reductions in fecundity. Oogenesis in EcR mutant females is defective, and the spectrum of oogenic defects includes the presence of abnormal egg chambers and loss of vitellogenic egg stages. Our results demonstrate a requirement for EcR during female reproduction and suggest that EcR is required for normal oogenesis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 125 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 25%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 8%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 28%
Unspecified 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 15 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2014.
All research outputs
#9,516,131
of 27,787,196 outputs
Outputs from Genetics
#3,650
of 7,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,465
of 47,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,787,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.