↓ Skip to main content

Difference between Luminal A and Luminal B Subtypes According to Ki-67, Tumor Size, and Progesterone Receptor Negativity Providing Prognostic Information

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
489 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Difference between Luminal A and Luminal B Subtypes According to Ki-67, Tumor Size, and Progesterone Receptor Negativity Providing Prognostic Information
Published in
Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology, September 2014
DOI 10.4137/cmo.s18006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 489 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Croatia 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 484 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 63 13%
Student > Master 55 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 10%
Researcher 24 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 4%
Other 52 11%
Unknown 230 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 76 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 65 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 2%
Other 36 7%
Unknown 241 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2026.
All research outputs
#8,597,995
of 32,684,864 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
#55
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,106
of 271,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,684,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them