↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Medical Nutrition Therapy by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist in Patients with Prediabetes Participating in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Research Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
guideline
6 clinical guideline sources
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Effect of Medical Nutrition Therapy by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist in Patients with Prediabetes Participating in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Research Trial
Published in
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jand.2014.07.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 263 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 16%
Researcher 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 5%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 99 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 103 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,637,855
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
#381
of 1,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,037
of 281,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
#8
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.