↓ Skip to main content

Fitting the Pieces of the Puzzle: The δ Bond

Overview of attention for article published in Inorganic Chemistry, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fitting the Pieces of the Puzzle: The δ Bond
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, September 2014
DOI 10.1021/ic500119h
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The development of our understanding of the δ bond and its role in quadruple metal-metal bonding is described in terms of the conceptual advances and experimental and theoretical results achieved through a 50-year period beginning with the seminal report by Cotton and co-workers in 1964. The work behind the original discovery is described, along with the qualitative orbital description of the components of the quadruple bond. The effect of torsion about the metal-metal axis on the metal-metal bond length is described, together with the conclusion that this accords with a progressive loss of the δ component of the metal-metal bond. The important role of photoelectron spectroscopy in characterizing the loss of electrons from the metal-metal bonding orbitals is reviewed, as are the electron paramagnetic resonance results that establish that unpaired electrons, when present, populate metal-based orbitals. Other important results are described: destabilization of the metal-metal bond to produce strong reducing agents, exceptions to the expected orbital ordering, and the use of chiroptical properties to reveal additional information about the electronic structure of the metal-metal bond.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Researcher 11 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 44 70%
Materials Science 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2026.
All research outputs
#8,732,502
of 29,325,544 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#4,856
of 26,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,213
of 264,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#46
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,325,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,701 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.