↓ Skip to main content

Energetic dissection of Gleevec's selectivity toward human tyrosine kinases

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
4 Google+ users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Energetic dissection of Gleevec's selectivity toward human tyrosine kinases
Published in
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, September 2014
DOI 10.1038/nsmb.2891
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Protein kinases are obvious drug targets against cancer, owing to their central role in cellular regulation. Since the discovery of Gleevec, a potent and specific inhibitor of Abl kinase, as a highly successful cancer therapeutic, the ability of this drug to distinguish between Abl and other tyrosine kinases such as Src has been intensely investigated but without much success. Using NMR and fast kinetics, we establish a new model that solves this longstanding question of how the two tyrosine kinases adopt almost identical structures when bound to Gleevec but have vastly different affinities. We show that, in contrast to all other proposed models, the origin of Abl's high affinity lies predominantly in a conformational change after binding. An energy landscape providing tight affinity via an induced fit and binding plasticity via a conformational-selection mechanism is likely to be general for many inhibitors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 212 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 22%
Student > Bachelor 36 16%
Student > Master 17 8%
Professor 11 5%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 25 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 27%
Chemistry 43 19%
Physics and Astronomy 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 32 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,620,129
of 28,374,131 outputs
Outputs from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#612
of 3,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,551
of 261,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,374,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.