↓ Skip to main content

Physiological links between circadian rhythms, metabolism and nutrition

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Physiology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Physiological links between circadian rhythms, metabolism and nutrition
Published in
Experimental Physiology, September 2014
DOI 10.1113/expphysiol.2014.078295
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Circadian rhythms, metabolism and nutrition are closely interlinked. A great deal of recent research has investigated not only how aspects of metabolic physiology are driven by circadian clocks, but also how these circadian clocks are themselves sensitive to metabolic change. At the cellular level, novel feedback loops have been identified that couple circadian 'clock genes' and their proteins to expression of nuclear receptors, regulation of redox state and other major pathways. Using targeted disruption of circadian clocks, mouse models are providing novel insight into the role of tissue-specific clocks in glucose homeostasis and body weight regulation. The relationship between circadian rhythms and obesity appears complex, with variable alteration of rhythms in obese individuals. However, it is clear from animal studies that the timing and nutritional composition of meals can regulate circadian rhythms, particularly in peripheral tissues. Translation of these findings to human physiology now represents an important goal.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 192 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Student > Master 25 13%
Researcher 23 12%
Professor 12 6%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 45 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 52 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,330,258
of 34,240,007 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Physiology
#360
of 3,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,967
of 281,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Physiology
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,240,007 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.