↓ Skip to main content

Improving management support tools for reintroducing bivalve species (Eastern oyster [Crassostrea virginica Gmelin]) in urban estuaries

Overview of attention for article published in Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Improving management support tools for reintroducing bivalve species (Eastern oyster [Crassostrea virginica Gmelin]) in urban estuaries
Published in
Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/ieam.1553
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Successful reintroduction of 'ecologically extinct' bivalve species into anthropogenically impaired urban estuaries is problematic when employing existing management tools used in estuaries where bivalves are present (GIS-based restoration models, expanding existing shellfish beds, placement of shell substrate, physical oceanographic parameters). A significant management challenge is appropriate site selection. We are proposing the inclusion of a biological parameter (evaluation of tissue histopathology) in an inexpensive and rapid site selection model to inform management decision-making and identify sites with the greatest potential for reintroduction success. Use of biological biomarkers is not a new concept, but it is important that they be included in a multi-tiered management approach to bivalve reintroduction. This Case Study tested adult Eastern Oysters (Crassostrea virginica Gmelin) from locations which supported comparable short-term survival rates by evaluating growth and tissue health/disease. Biomarkers indicated oyster tissues at one site were normal, the female:male sex ratio was 50:50, and female oysters were in spawning condition. Conversely, oyster tissues at the second site exhibited multiple abnormalities, samples were 100% male, and the incidence of disease was high. Using the biomarker tool, we evaluated four additional sites where oysters exhibited short-term (one year) survival. At two locations we observed chronic health impacts that would preclude reintroduction, including samples from one site where a wild population was surviving. We also analyzed tissue and shell heavy metal contents. Soft tissue metal concentrations in Meadowlands samples were at the high range of scientific literature values, averaging 1.1% of total body weight, while tissue metal concentrations at the Keyport site were within acceptable ranges. Although initial survival and growth rates at both locations were comparable, site-specific urban stressors reduced oyster fitness at one of the two locations. We are proposing an Estuarine Reintroduction Site Selection Model, which includes a biological in situ parameter, to increase the probability of successfully managing a sustainable oyster reintroduction prior to commencing expensive large scale restoration activities. Integr Environ Assess Manag © 2014 SETAC.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 42%
Environmental Science 18 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#22,899,891
of 33,928,890 outputs
Outputs from Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management
#649
of 1,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,707
of 271,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,928,890 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.