↓ Skip to main content

Differences in Short-term Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing IPAA With or Without Preoperative Radiation

Overview of attention for article published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Differences in Short-term Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing IPAA With or Without Preoperative Radiation
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, October 2014
DOI 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000206
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Single-institution studies demonstrate a correlation between preoperative pelvic radiation and poor long-term pouch function after IPAA. The rarity of the radiated pelvis before these procedures limits the ability to draw conclusions on the effects of preoperative radiation on short-term outcomes, which may contribute to long-term pouch dysfunction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2014.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#3,647
of 4,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,797
of 265,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#27
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.