↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of two observational pain assessment scales during the anaesthesia recovery period in Chinese surgical older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluation of two observational pain assessment scales during the anaesthesia recovery period in Chinese surgical older adults
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, September 2014
DOI 10.1111/jocn.12677
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li‐Li Guo, Li Li, Yao‐Wei Liu, Keela Herr

Abstract

To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale and the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Indicators in Chinese older adults post surgery during the anaesthesia recovery period.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 21%
Student > Master 11 18%
Librarian 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 18%
Psychology 7 11%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#16,641,002
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#4,100
of 5,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,837
of 255,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#40
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.