↓ Skip to main content

Additive manufacturing of titanium alloys in the biomedical field: processes, properties and applications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
555 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Additive manufacturing of titanium alloys in the biomedical field: processes, properties and applications
Published in
Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials, September 2017
DOI 10.5301/jabfm.5000371
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The mechanical properties and biocompatibility of titanium alloy medical devices and implants produced by additive manufacturing (AM) technologies - in particular, selective laser melting (SLM), electron beam melting (EBM) and laser metal deposition (LMD) - have been investigated by several researchers demonstrating how these innovative processes are able to fulfil medical requirements for clinical applications. This work reviews the advantages given by these technologies, which include the possibility to create porous complex structures to improve osseointegration and mechanical properties (best match with the modulus of elasticity of local bone), to lower processing costs, to produce custom-made implants according to the data for the patient acquired via computed tomography and to reduce waste.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 555 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 555 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 13%
Student > Master 64 12%
Researcher 51 9%
Student > Bachelor 41 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 5%
Other 67 12%
Unknown 234 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 153 28%
Materials Science 64 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 5%
Unspecified 7 1%
Design 7 1%
Other 34 6%
Unknown 264 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2026.
All research outputs
#7,852,278
of 27,788,586 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials
#10
of 95 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,650
of 333,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,586 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them